Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: "Blocking" legal?

  1. #1
    Noble Bobj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    457

    "Blocking" legal?

    Was just wondering as to the legality of the technique known as "blocking". You basically will send in a dummy general with 1 recruit to "block" that camps aggro radius while you go and attack the leader with the real troops. It seems like this is a bug exploit, or hacking, or at the very least against the spirit of the game. Was just wondering if there was an official Blue Byte stance on this practice. I've never done this but it came to my attention and was alarmed to know people were doing this.

    Signature by emahs2! ........ Looking for an adventure? Start your search here! ....Also Buying eggs!

  2. #2
    Mayor EpsilonSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,473
    World
    Zeus
    Actually found this technique in The Art of War by Sun Tzu.

    IMO it is a really cool tactic.
    You are essentially suiciding a general and preoccupying a camp u want to avoid.
    I never thought of it, but w/9 generals, I am willing to try it.
    Let's hope this is okay and not an exploit.

  3. #3
    Veteran General Jethro702's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    598
    World
    Zeus
    I use it some times, to save troops. I have never thought of it as a bug exploit, but you give a valid arguement
    Creator of the Old TSO Guide List, which is now in xMISTY's control..
    Joined Aug.8.2011

  4. #4
    Mayor EpsilonSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,473
    World
    Zeus
    Here is a post by Dynamite with videos showing the technique.
    This seem like a very clever tactic and I am convinced it is good to go.
    http://forum.castleempireonline.com/...king-Technique.

  5. #5
    Noble Bobj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by SirRoy View Post
    Here is a post by Dynamite with videos showing the technique.
    This seem like a very clever tactic and I am convinced it is good to go.
    Yeah I was not trying to cite anyone but it perfectly illustrates what I'm talking about. Just was wondering what Blue Byte's take on this is going to be.

    Signature by emahs2! ........ Looking for an adventure? Start your search here! ....Also Buying eggs!

  6. #6
    Recruit Chompman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    26
    Probably something to be looked at to get fixed and make the armies wait in line. :P

  7. #7
    Noble Bobj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    457
    I just remember A conversation in general chat like months ago where this was being discussed and the consensus then (unofficial of course) was that it would most likely be a direct violation of the ToS. Guess we shall have to wait til Monday to have our answer.

    Signature by emahs2! ........ Looking for an adventure? Start your search here! ....Also Buying eggs!

  8. #8
    Mayor EpsilonSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,473
    World
    Zeus
    How is sending an army with 1 recruit a violation of TOS?
    Jeesh, they need to be rooting out these multi-acct users, not wasting time with this.

  9. #9
    Soldier
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    83
    World
    Zeus
    Is a strat, not a bug...jeez

  10. #10
    Settler
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Lexington Virginia
    Posts
    232
    World
    Zeus
    Quote Originally Posted by lowprofile View Post
    Is a strat, not a bug...jeez

    Definitely agree. Its smart thinking , not cheating.

Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts