Marble deposits

[Seikatsukira]

Marble deposits run out WAY too quickly. I vote for bigger deposits ( close to that of stone )

[hawkinsmhm]

I agree with Seikatsukira, we need to have a little more to work with , you buy gems and use them to replenish marble, it gets costly.

[FieryEmber]

Have to agree on this subject, marble deposits could be larger because the way it is now just makes it another chore on the daily grind of having to search for deposits as well as rebuilding other stuff. There are better things we can spend our time on.

[EpsilonSilver]

You may need fewer levels of marble masons.

[WilliamMunny]

Why would anyone use gems to replenish marble?

[Cornbreadx]

I honestly think that mines should not count towards your building limit. I think that's lame since it takes more time for the server to account for a mine that has run out then when you catch it and try to reset. I also think that Gold mines should cost half as much as they do because it makes gold mining almost totally pointless. I can make more gold coins selling tools, swords, and such than i could mining gold ore, changing it to bars, and then to coins. I can see the smelters and coiners costing tons of resources, but not the mines - it's out of whack with the rest of the mines.

Also, coal mines have an excessive amount of materials, why can't the other mines have close to or at least half that for each type!

[Buttpaste]

agreed. We need more marble.