Crisis Quest Feedback

[EpsilonSilver]

Yuck

[RomanGodCamper]

not real keen on se (or in my case sov) but at least it is:
multi-player
and lots of them around
I had to stop 4 winds when it became impossible to get any more bandits nests
so whether people are happy about it or not at least they addressed the problem in some way

SE isn't hard. It's just time consuming really. I've used my Cannoneers on SE and they did the job

[rufferto]

This crisis quest isn't worth doing ,they wish us to waste resources and give us next to impossible adventures to do .Then give a little back for when we complete a quest,unless they become worth the time ,they shouldn't put out these quests.

[Arcain]

That being said, some of the rewards to costs are excessively bad, especially for upper level players, but on the flip side 2500 gems or free buildings as a reward is never, I repeat, NEVER, going to happen. This game is a business, and giving away the products that make them money is a bad business strategy.

They've actually given away many free buildings. I've gotten watermills, silos, and most notable a free recycle plant once. Granted that was a long time ago. But free buildings are always appreciated. So they do (have) give away buildings so that argument is invalid. But there also has to be a balance between the "status quo" playing for what gamers want and the baffling reward structure given in this crisis quest. I totally understand the making it a challenge part. But there should be a reward that is equivalent to the cost of the challenge. I'm not doing the quest mostly bc I refuse to build an expert building I have no plans or desire to build simply for a quest. But also bc the cost far exceed the rewards. Honestly I might have considered doing the crisis quest had it not been for the expert building requirement. I still wouldn't have been happy about rewards, but I would have done it for something different. Lv 50 is boring and I'm really hoping for 50+ content soon. Not "soon" as in 6 months from now.

[Ashtabula]

I'm level 38 and they want me to do the Sons of The Veld adventure. That quest requires Elites and Canons which aren't available until level 41 at the earliest. Completely ridiciulous quest!!

[MarMarl]

I'm level 38 and they want me to do the Sons of The Veld adventure. That quest requires Elites and Canons which aren't available until level 41 at the earliest. Completely ridiciulous quest!!

Ash, it doesn't actually require them, it's just more efficient with those units (less losses per XP/loot).

[TeaTime]

How about putting an "X" on that quest so I can just cancel it ?

[Sir_Vark_of_Aard]

I loved the crisis quests. I enjoyed both of them. They were new and different, and provided new experiences in the game.
The Fallen Army seemed quite a bit easier to complete. I would rather they be more challenging, but I did like the change in the
"explorer treasure search." During the first crisis quest (which originally we had only a week to complete), many players were
stuck for days looking for resources with many explorers (I for instance have 12, and was still stuck for days) due to really poor
random number results.

I also agree with the comments that the rewards are not really special enough. Not that they need to be "greater," but it would
be nice if they were "special." Also, some feed-back as to how many players started and completed it would be interesting.
Were those that finished it one out of 75%, or one out of 7% ??

Overall, great job. Thank you for the crisis quests.

[Ezequiel_Sarkar]

I'm level 38 and they want me to do the Sons of The Veld adventure. That quest requires Elites and Canons which aren't available until level 41 at the earliest. Completely ridiciulous quest!!

You can also aquire a loot spot for one. Then it's cheaper for you.

[Ezequiel_Sarkar]

How about putting an "X" on that quest so I can just cancel it ?

Would it be ideal to be able to cancel this adventure? Answer: Yes

Would there be bugs if it was cancelled? Answer: I'm leaning yes. (ie you may get rewarded the gems because they probably didn't do "Did the player complete every adventure? If yes, reward, if No, don't reward)

How come I could cancel the Christmas/Easter Event but not this one? Answer: You were cancelling daily event quests, you were not cancelling the event.

Re: So what? Answer: Please see what my suspicion is if they allowed cancellation with the bug theory.
Further Explanation: The reason is, in Easter/Christmas, a new quest came up the following day. In this one, if you cancelled you either cancel the event or you cancel the subquest. If it cancels the subquest, there is a high probability it will continue onto the next one thinking you have already completed this one. They need to be completed in a certain order at this point. And let's say you canel 4/6 or however many there is, and you complete/cancel the last one. Did the Developers right a check in the system to say if you cancel one, it cancels all of them? Or if you cancelled one, but completed the rest, would you get the same reward as originally? It really depends on if the Devs took the time to modify the code to include the cancellation option. Better yet, it is easier to just force it where cancellation is not an option and it stays up for 2 weeks and then it's gone and they only hear the groaning of not able to cancel for two-four weeks. Last year we couldn't cancel the adventure either. People groaned through it then just like we are doing now.

If you have any questions, feel free to reply or mail me in game.