This doesn't remotely address any of the concerns here. You clearly just skimmed through what was said and didn't actually pay attention to it.Originally Posted by BB_Effiluna
This doesn't remotely address any of the concerns here. You clearly just skimmed through what was said and didn't actually pay attention to it.
I'm failing to see how this competition is deemed fair to BB standards the rankings for every event continue to show the same results. I would really like to know where the numbers and factors are coming from for these events that they are being deemed as fair competitions? I.E: say a server has 100 players, 50 actives.. out of those 50 actives 45 are lvl 50's... another server has same amount of players, and actives but only 10 lvl 50 players are these the factors u are taking into consideration for fair competitions? I would really like to know the breakdowns to maybe give some good solid numbers of my own to future realistic fair competitions. Thanks
When I comment, it is because I have read fully. However, I am not always able to provide the answers you are looking for. I will, however, forward the concerns in this thread to Blue Byte. The game world pairings are now public in the event window. If I receive any additional information, I will publish it as soon as possible.
As you can see a head start wouldn't have even mattered...obviously there are some servers that would outshine everyone else as can be deduced by looking at the current leader board. I do believe they messed up royally with how they paired realms together. It should have been a very tight race but the leader board tells a way different story. Every single server should be neck and neck if they were paired correctly.
You are right, but that is a very big if. I don't think they cared about pairing people together to much really. All the German servers are together really and then the British servers are together and then everyone else is just thrown into the bunch with Zeus and Ares paired together.
We understand that BB_Effiluna. We are relying on you to advocate for the players. I'm sure you are :-)
Still around from time to time.
If you read it well then I'm not sure why you gave all the same information that we already knew. The fact that game worlds would be collaborating was known in the question so you responded by saying that game worlds would be collaborating...very unhelpful!
I do think that you work hard for us gamers in general but I stand by the fact that your response to this thread was poor.
where are my cookies 8
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote