In my opinion these things need to be taken in game. It's not that hard to implement a voting system into the game. It will be helpful for the future anyway. I'm not saying forum should be crossed out completely. But, it will target that "90%" (<= where do you guys get that number anyway???). What do you guys think?Originally Posted by RomanGodCamper
Sounds like excellent changes and now more community focused with a vision. Good job!
Still around from time to time.
maybe it's just me but i saw nothing come out of the CL program. except nerfed nukes and getting called cheaters by one. having any player in a "leadership" position will only lead to distrust and misuse of authority. des the community need a "police" force?....yes there will always be the random kid that creates an account just to stir up trouble. the program might have worked if it had been implemented better noe the hey look smitey and SP have green text and no one knew anything about it. as for the CLs being a liason between players and UBISOFT well the company pays little to no attention to what players ask for in the forums so why would they listen to the CLs which IMO were put in place to distract from real game issues and decent suggestions from players. a litttle saying that we had in the army was "yes i have an open door policy" but i'm out of the office all day. aka checking the box never leads to anything good. either commit to a program and support it or just leave it be and continue with ignoring of players wants.
Well considering that it wasn't done. It means they have other plans and want other people to get involved with it as well and not have the cap at 10. Just a cap of 3 CLs that we don't know to do whatever and then after 3 months they will get kicked out and 3 more players will fill the spots and so on and so fourth.
looks like rgc needs a new forum title too
Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat. ~Robert A. Heinlein
Lol yeah. I'm not sure why it hasn't changed it. Rawren said everything was done >.>looks like rgc needs a new forum title too
Sometimes programs need tweaking and change is hard for everyone who is resistant to change so you need to consider the impact of the change on those involved. In any case, if you are ready to go forward with the changes, make sure everything is ready to go such as new titles or whatever else you need to make the change. You do have a good plan for projects that the new CLs will work on. Those projects look good for those wanting to improve the gaming community to get involved.
Still around from time to time.
People have a hard time adapting to abbreviations... gc (gold coins o.o) to guild coins O_O! You see my point here. I totally agree with ya!Sometimes programs need tweaking and change is hard for everyone who is resistant to change so you need to consider the impact of the change on those involved. In any case, if you are ready to go forward with the changes, make sure everything is ready to go such as new titles or whatever else you need to make the change. You do have a good plan for projects that the new CLs will work on. Those projects look good for those wanting to improve the gaming community to get involved.
I think its a shame that CL_type program wont be involved in development. They really need to get some knowledgeable players better integrated into alpha and beta testing of ideas. I feel the devs currently largely ignore balance feedback from the players.
More of the same "new" content with a different bow? I will give more of the "same" towards my gem accumulation.
hear, hear!!
If something can go wrong, it will.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote