OK so this is my fault because of imprecise expression. The MA wasn't nerfed on test by devs. As it is now on life MA is the most effective general. On more than 80% of all camps (my personal experience) it performs almost equal or even better (depends on troops/enemies composition) than Major general. Additional it can saves troops in adventures because of his special abilities. Saccing MA with 1r can wipe anywhere between 20-50 enemies in a camp making the 2nd wave attack much easier and less costly.
This was why so many players bought it and why we were all so excited about it. It made possible for players under 50 to do adventures that were very hard without Major general, and do them effectively with reasonable cost. MA cost of RB is almost 100R only more than Major? Just as example.
ON test all adventures that are not going to be affected by combat changes will also not affect MA effectiveness. However, by making the enemies harder and changing the attacks all adventures that are going to be changed (epic, FT) will drop MA effectiveness to almost BHG level. This does change its usefulness, simply it is not as attractive as it is now in those adventures. Numbers are already there so those are not rumors. It is not his abilities being nerfed, the upgraded hp/dmg of enemies in those adventures "are nerfing MA". And the players didn't do this did they? There are few proposed changes on test (by players) tha can easily salvage the situation and keep MA in line with its effectiveness even on the "upgraded" adventures. A tiny tweeks, not a major change.
Why I am posting this here? Because there seem to be a vacuum of communication on test. And the additional proposed changes by the devs to beef up even more epic adventures (AFTER players feedback says clearly they are a bit too hard) makes even those cool testers heads wonder what's going on? Uncertainty of where is the game going is also not healthy. People are holding back on gems purchases because they simply lost trust in the dev team. You blame them?
Hope this clarifies the topic.


Reply With Quote
