Maybe we could agree that in any RNG-type of "achievement", some people will get less, and that it does appear some people consistently got bit more than others in this event? You were fortunate to NOT have that problem, but perhaps you could acknowledge the possibility that others may have? Or is it just like Troll-Phu said, you didn't have the problem, therefore it must not exist?
With 11 explorers (3 regs, 2 luckies, 6 fast),
constantly on adventures varying from medium to extra long, looks like I will end up about 300 eggs shy of the 3200 "magic" mark (literally have gotten *zero* back from searches sent out today, so I think perhaps my event is already over). I was on track to hit the achievement prior to the nerf, fell off that track after the nerf, but at that point I wasn't about to go buy more explorers and such - trust was broken and who knew what the pattern would be going forward?
I've been tracking the numbers for the past week, I got zero from explorer searches just over 50% of the time, and hardly every got more than the medium number of eggs when eggs were returned. My luckies, in particular, were horrible in their returns post-nerf. IIRC, I had about 1200 eggs from explorers after the first week, so that means I got about 1700 eggs from explorers over the next two weeks, so - for me - a quantifiable decrease, and not one that measures up to the "official" explanation.
So, whatever. I accept that perhaps having the "full set of explorers" (i.e., 20 or so) was the original intention, but disagree with their decision to implement a change mid-event. I also accept that my RNG seed may be worse than yours, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.
