PvP Rankings ~ Efficiency

[Perwyn]

Time rankings are compiled by map size, why not efficiency too?

The current efficiency rankings weigh in favor of small maps, which are the easiest. Regular maps are harder, but are easier than large maps. Lumping them all together in one ranking isn't an accurate representation of what people are actually accomplishing any more than lumping all the average times together regardless of map size would be. I'm suggesting a separate efficiency page for each map size added to rankings to replace the current efficiency page.

[Pinkleet]

I can see a clear picture of a BB reading this and rolling their eyes... "They wanted pvp- we gave them, then they wanted ranking- we gave them, now the ranking is not good enough..."

Perwyn you understand while back when BB started developing "pvp" some players were invited to a "secret" server to test it and give feedback? 2 questions were asked of them: 1.If they enjoy pvp and 2.If they like cats.
Only players who responded yes to 2nd question were invited to participate in the development.

That explains a lot about current state of "pvp" doesn't it?